December 13, 2004
So do not even for a minute imagine I think Bush is “the anti-Christ,” whether metaphorically or otherwise. But the fact others do think that about Bush is significant information, and the fact that it is now being discussed in the context of a Left-Right struggle within the Christian community – and discussed by a publication so avowedly secular as The Seattle Weekly – is a significant development indeed. Here is an especially noteworthy passage:
..."1 John seems to be obsessed with language like this: 'How can you say you love God, who you have not seen, if you do not love your brother and sister, who you have seen?' Who are in need of food, clothing, shelter? The implication of the doctrine of the Antichrist is that there is an economic disparity in the community, and people are using their religion, not practicing it."
Bush policy is based on what he told his Harvard Business School professor— "Poor people are poor because they're lazy." Responds Lang, "Again, anti-Christ. It's just the opposite [of Christ's teaching]. The thrust of right-wing Christianity—their solution to poverty is to discipline the poor...”
Having spent most of my boyhood in Bible-belt Appalachia, I saw this ugly truth about Fundamentalist viciousness demonstrated more times than I can count. The relationship between the local Fundamentalist preachers and the big bosses at the mine or the textile mill or any other sweatshop was psychologically identical to the relationship between the obergrupenfuehrer and the manager at a Nazi German factory: the preacher/obergrupenfuehrer provided the oppressive doctrines – “the Bible tells us it is our Christian duty to obey without question those appointed over us” (which includes ratting out anybody who talked to that union organizer) – and the Big Boss took care of the exploitation. And to release all the resultant pent-up rage that exploited peoples always feel, there was often the “Saturday Night Men’s Bible Study Group” aka the KuKluxKlan. In the years of my boyhood, the hate-objects were blacks and those who worked for black rights – “nigger-lovers,” of whom I am proud to say I was one. This time – and having witnessed the phenomenon before, I can see it coming ‘round again – it will be gays and lesbians and their defenders, regardless of color.
One more word about The Seattle Weekly before I pass on the link: my instinct is to take anything it says with a very large grain of salt, for in my experience it is a pretentious, superficial, repugnantly yuppoid, hot-tub-radical rag far more concerned with style than substance. But I have not read it for several years, so my judgement may be outdated and invalid. Indeed the article from which I lifted the above paragraphs suggests (despite the mediocre style of the writing) The Weekly is at last trying to come of age. Whatever; the report is available in full here. I pass it on because, if its author is even halfway right, America is heading for a religious struggle the like of which has hitherto been seen only in Europe, and that at least a century ago. But with the special police powers given this Fundamentalist-dominated government in the name of the war against Islam, the Fundamentalists have absolutely all the advantages.
Posted by: Loren at
12:07 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 744 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Sophie at December 13, 2004 08:07 PM (Lutps)
40 queries taking 0.1045 seconds, 79 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.